ANDROID layout with fix header footer and center area

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
            xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
       android:layout_width="match_parent"
   android:layout_height="match_parent"
   xmlns:ads="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto">
   <RelativeLayout
           android:id="@+id/rl_fixHeader"
   android:layout_width="match_parent"
   android:layout_height="30dp"
   android:layout_alignParentTop="true"
   android:background="#123456"
   android:gravity="center"      
                    android:layout_gravity="center">
   <TextView
       android:id="@+id/fix_header_text"
       android:layout_width="wrap_content"
                        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
       android:text="@string/fix_header_msg"        
       android:textSize="25sp"/>
   </RelativeLayout>
   <RelativeLayout
           android:id="@+id/rl_fix_footer"
   android:layout_width="match_parent"
   android:layout_height="30dp"
   android:layout_alignParentBottom="true"
   android:background="#654321"
   android:gravity="center"      
                    android:layout_gravity="center">
   <TextView
       android:id="@+id/fix_footer_text"
       android:layout_width="wrap_content"
                        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
       android:text="@string/footer_msg"
       android:textColor="#FFFFFF"
       android:gravity="center"
       android:textSize="25sp"/>
   </RelativeLayout>
   <ScrollView
   android:id="@+id/sv_scroll_view"
   android:layout_width="fill_parent"
   android:layout_height="fill_parent"
   android:layout_above="@+id/rl_fix_footer"
   android:layout_below="@+id/rl_fixHeader"
   android:fillViewport="true">  
<LinearLayout
   android:id="@+id/ll_myScrollLayout"
   android:orientation="vertical"
   android:layout_width="match_parent"
   android:layout_height="wrap_content"
   android:background="#FFFFFF"
   android:fillViewport="true">
   <TextView
       android:id="@+id/tvBodytext"
       android:layout_width="wrap_content"
               android:layout_height="wrap_content"
       android:text="@string/body_msg"      
       android:gravity="center"
       android:textSize="25sp"/>
</LinearLayout>
   </ScrollView>
</RelativeLayout>  

What is Wildcard Capture , Get and Put Principle and wildcard restrictions?

What is Wildcard Capture ?
When a generic method is called then the type parameter is choosen to replace the unknow type represented by the wildcard.
this is called wildcapture. in short when any type replace the wildcard in the method or any collection then it is called wildcard capture.

What is Get and Put Principle ?
In generics use extends with wildcard ( ? extends AnyType) when you just want to GET values from the collection and
use super with wildcard ( ? super AnyType) whenever you want to put values in to collection.

What are the restrictions on wildcard ??

1) wildcards cannot be used with the instance creation(new)
List<?>  dataList = new ArrayList<?>(); // INVALID , it will show compile time error
Map<String, ? extends Number> dataMap = new HashMap<String, ? extends Number>(); // this will show compile time error

the reason behind this restriction is the GET and PUT principle because when you want to do both then it requires a precise type.
so it requires precise type at the instance creation.

But yes this is allowed
List<List<?>> lists = new ArrayList<List<?>>(); 
because here each individual list will have specific type related data.
here the wildcard type prohibits us from extracting elements from the inner lists as any type
other than Object.

2) Wildcard cannot be used in the explicit type parameter in generic method call
when a generic method includes a explicit type parameter then that method call cannot contain a wildcard as a type parameteer.
example
public static <T> List<T> dataList() { return new ArrayList<T>(); }

above method cannot be called as List<?> list = Lists.<?>factory();  it will give compile time error.
but it can be called as List<List<?>> = Lists.<List<?>>factory(); as explained above witt the nested list example.

and yes whatever restrictions are applied with the instance creations all that are applied with the supertype.
any superclass or superinterface has the type parameter then that cannot be wild card

class AnyList extends ArrayList<?> { } //  this will give compile-time error

class MyList implements List<?> { } // this will give  compile-time error

What is array subtyping is covariant means ?

It means array DOVE[] is considered to be subtype of BIRD[] if DOVE is a subclass of BIRD.
example
Integer[] ints = new Integer[]{9,99};
Number[] nums =  ints;
nums[1] = 1.9; // here it will throw array store exception
According to the substitution principle the assignment on the second line is legal
but the exception will be throws at the run time on the third line.
Because whenever an array is created then it tagged with its reified type. here it is integer.
eventhough it is assigned to the Number (super type)  type here internally it points to it
Integer type so it throws exception at run time when it detects a float value assigned.

While in contrats for generics the subtype relation is invariant, means
List<DOVE> is not considered to be subtype of List<BIRD>.

example
List<Integer> intList =  Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9);
List<Number>  numList = intList; // here it will show compile time error


But here with wild card we can achieve the covariant
in that case here List<DOVE> is considered to be subtype of List<? extends BIRD>.

How the JVM Locates, Loads, and Runs Libraries

Classes are the building blocks of Java’s type system, but

they also serve another fundamental purpose: a class

is a compilation unit, the smallest piece of code that can be

individually loaded and run a JVM process. The class-loading

mechanism was set from the beginning of Java time, back in

JDK 1.0, and it immensely affected Java’s popularity as a crossplatform

solution. Compiled Java code—in the form of class

files and packaged JAR files—can be loaded into a running

JVM process on any of many supported operating systems.

It’s this ability that has allowed developers to easily distribute

compiled binaries of libraries. Because it is so much easier to

distribute JAR files than source code or platform-dependent

binaries, this ability has made Java popular, particularly in

open source projects.

In this article, I explain the Java class-loading mechanism

in detail and how it works. I also explain how classes are

found in the classpath and how are they loaded into memory

and initialized for use.

The Mechanics of Loading Classes into the JVM

Imagine you have a simple Java program such as the one

below:

public class A {

public static void main(String[] args) {

         B b = new B();

           int i = b.inc(0);

            System.out.println(i);

 }

}

When you compile this piece of code and run it, the JVM

correctly determines the entry point into the program and

starts running the main method of class A. However, the JVM

doesn’t load all imported classes or even referred-to classes

eagerly—that is, right away. In particular, this means that

only when the JVM encounters the bytecode instructions for

the new B() statement will it try to locate and load class B.

Besides calling a constructor of a class, there are other ways

to initiate the process of loading a class, such as accessing

a static member of the class or accessing it through the

Reflection API.

In order to actually load a class, the JVM uses classloader

objects. Every already loaded class contains a reference

to its class loader, and that class loader is used to

load all the classes referenced from that class. In the preceding

example, this means that loading class B can be

approximately translated into the following Java statement:

A.class.getClassLoader().loadClass("B").

Here comes a paradox: every class loader is itself an object of the java.lang.Classloader type that developers

can use to locate and load the classes by name. If

you’re confused by this chicken-and-egg problem

and wonder how the first class loader that

loads all the JDK classes (for example, java.lang

.String) is created, you’re thinking along the right

lines. Indeed, the primordial class loader, called

the bootstrap class loader, comes from the core

of the JVM and is written in native platformdependent

code. It loads the classes necessary

for the JVM itself, such as those of the java.lang

package, classes for Java primitives, and so forth.

Application classes are loaded using the regular,

user-defined class loaders written in Java—so, if

needed, the developer can influence the processing

of these loaders.

The Class-Loader Hierarchy

The class loaders in the JVM are organized into

a tree hierarchy, in which every class loader

has a parent. Prior to trying to locate and load a

class, a good practice for a class loader is to check

whether the class’s parent in the hierarchy can

load—or already has loaded—the required class. This helps

avoid doing double work and loading classes repeatedly. As a

rule, the classes of the parent class loader are visible to the

children but are not visible otherwise. This structure, which

is based on delegation and visibility of the classes, allows for

separation of the responsibilities of the class loaders in the

hierarchy and makes the class loaders responsible for loading

classes from a specific location only.

Let’s look at this hierarchy of class loaders in a Java application

and explore what classes they typically load. At the

root of the hierarchy, Java is the bootstrap class loader. It

loads the system classes required to run the JVM itself. You

can expect all the classes that were provided with the JDK

distribution to be loaded by this class loader.

(A developer can expand the set of classes that

the bootstrap class loader will be able to load by

using the -Xbootclasspath JVM option.)

Note that even though the library might be

put on the boot classpath, it won’t be automatically

loaded and initialized. Classes are loaded

into the JVM only on demand, so even though

classes might be available for the bootstrap class

loader, the application needs to access them to

trigger their actual loading. (A curious aspect of

this loading process is that you can override JDK

classes if your JAR file is prepended to the boot

classpath. While this is almost always a poor

idea, it does open a door to potentially morepowerful

tools.)

A sort of child of the bootstrap class loader is

the extension class loader, which loads the classes

from the extension directories (explained in a

moment). These classes may be used to specify

machine-specific configuration such as locales,

security providers, and such. The locations of

the extension directories are specified via the

java.ext.dirs system property, which on my machine is

set to the following:

/Users/shelajev/Library/Java/Extensions:/Library/

Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_40.jdk/Contents/

Home/jre/lib/ext:/Library/Java/Extensions:/Network/

Library/Java/Extensions:/System/Library/Java/

Extensions:/usr/lib/java

By changing the value of this property, you can change

which additional libraries are loaded into the JVM process.

Next comes the system class loader, which loads the

application classes and the classes available on the class-

path. Users can specify the classpath using the

-cp property.

Both the extension class loader and the system

class loader are of the URLClassloader type and

behave in the same way: delegating to the parent

first, and only then finding and resolving the

required classes themselves, if need dictates.

The class-loader hierarchy of web applications

is a bit more complicated. Because multiple

applications can be deployed simultaneously to an application

server, they need to be able to distinguish their classes

from each other. So, every web application uses its own class

loader, which is responsible for loading its libraries. Such

isolation ensures that different web applications deployed to

a single server can have different versions of the same library

without conflicts. So the application server automatically

provides every web application with its own class loader,

which is responsible for loading the application’s libraries.

This arrangement works because the web application class

loader will try to locate the classes packaged in the application’s

WAR file first, rather than first delegating the search to

the parent class loader.

Finding the Right Class

In general, if multiple classes with the same fully qualified

name are available to the JVM, the conflict resolution strategy

is simple and straightforward: the first appropriate class

wins. The URLClassloader, which most of the class loaders

extend from, will traverse the directories in the order they

are given on the classpath and load the first class it finds

that has requested the class name.

The same goes for JAR files that share the same name. The

JAR files will be scanned in the order in which they appear in

the classpath, not according to their names. If the first JAR

file contains an entry for the required class, the class will be

loaded. If not, the classpath scan will continue and reach the

second JAR file. Naturally, if the class isn’t

found anywhere on the classpath, the

ClassNotFound exception will be thrown.

Usually, relying on the order of directories

in the classpath is a fragile practice, so

instead the developer can add the classes to

-Xbootclasspath to ensure that they will be

loaded first. There’s nothing in particular wrong

with this approach, but maintaining a project

that relies on a polluted boot classpath requires work.

Intuition about where the classes are loaded from will be

broken, and everyone will be confused. A better practice is

to resolve the confusion at its root and figure out why there

are multiple classes with the same name on the classpath.

Maybe upgrading some dependency version, cleaning the

caches, or running a clean build will be enough to get rid of

the duplicates.

Resolution, Linking, and Verification

After a class is located and its initial in-memory representation

created in the JVM process, it is verified, prepared,

resolved, and initialized.

■■ Verification makes sure that the class is not corrupted and

is structurally correct: its runtime constant pool is valid,

the types of variables are correct, and the variables are

initialized prior to being accessed. Verification can be

turned off by supplying the -noverify option. If the JVM

process does not run potentially malicious code, strict

verification might not be required. Turning off the verification

can speed up the startup of the JVM. Another

benefit is that some classes, especially those generated

on the fly by various tools, can be valid and safe for the

JVM but unable to pass the strict verification process. In

order to use such tools, the developer should disable this

verification, which is often acceptable to do in a development

environment.

■■ Preparation of a class involves initializing its static fields to

the default values for their respective types. (After preparation,

fields of type int contain 0, references are null, and

so forth.)

■■ Resolution of a class means checking that the symbolic

references in the runtime constant pool actually point

to valid classes of the required types. The resolution of a

symbolic reference triggers loading of the referenced

class. According to the JVM specification, this resolution

process can be performed lazily, so it is deferred until the

class is used.

■■ Initialization expects a prepared and verified class. It runs

the class’s initializer. During initialization, the static fields

are initialized to whatever values are specified in the code.

The static initializer method that combines the code from

all the static initialization blocks is also run. The initialization

process should be run only once for every loaded class,

so it is synchronized, especially because the initialization

of the class can trigger the initialization of other classes

and should be performed with care to avoid deadlocks.

More detail on how the JVM performs the loading, linking,

and initializing of classes is explained in Chapter 5 of the Java

Virtual Machine Specification.

Other Considerations About Class Loaders

The class-loading model is the central piece of the dynamic

operations of the Java platform. Not only does it allow for

dynamic location and linking of classes at runtime, but

it also provides an interface for various tools to hook into

the application.

In addition, many security features rely on the class-loader

hierarchy for permission checks. For example, the famous

method sun.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe() successfully

returns an instance of the Unsafe class if it is called from a

class that was loaded by the bootstrap class loader. Because

only system classes are returned by this loader, every library

that uses the Unsafe API must rely on the Reflection API to

read the reference from a private field.

Conclusion

When you’re developing a library or a framework, as a rule,

you don’t have to worry about any issues with class loading.

It is a dynamic process that happens at runtime, so you

rarely need to influence it. Also, modifying the class-loading

scheme rarely benefits a typical Java library.

However, if you create a system of modules or plugins that

are intended to be isolated from each other, enhancing the

class-loading scheme might be a good idea. Just remember

that custom class loaders, being a fundamental force influencing

all the classes, can introduce hard-to-spot bugs into

literally any part of your application. So take extra care when

designing your own class-loading functionality.

In this article, we looked at how the JVM loads classes into

the runtime, at the hierarchical model of class loaders Java

uses, and the hierarchy model of a typical Java application.

All in all, even if you don’t fight class-loading issues or

create plugin architectures every day, understanding class

loading helps you to understand what is happening in your

application. It also provides insight into how several Java

tools work. And it really demonstrates the benefits of keeping

your classpath clean and up to date. </article>

Source : JAVA MAGAZINE 20151112